MEETING OF 5/28/2007
regard to root nodes of the issue, shared thoughts were concerned:
- the role of art. 3 cost. as cause and effect of analogy
- the need for definition / delineation of a class to apply the mechanism of analogy and the tools that are proper
- the function of equivalence, and the reasonableness of similutidine in the demarcation of classes
- assumptions of the legislature specifically exempted daparte
-legal application of the assumptions of analogy: the equivalence
E 'was found activity as a possible bargaining coverage, especially in terms of trends in case law regarding the cancellation will affect the contract award. Specifically, it was considered that since the judgments of the Supreme Civil and CDS in order to define a mapping of logical patterns in the reasoning of the judges.
As a point of reference of doctrinal reasoning is the contribution of Giannini.
Please note the sentence TAR Sicilia Palermo, Sec. I, April 21, 2006, No 901.
Al After the meeting it was decided to allow time for the two speakers to coordinate their ideas and actions, not without any recourse to the aid of other members of the group.
0 comments:
Post a Comment